Search report text, read a short matching passage, then open the source page.
Exact phrases match first; otherwise all words must occur close together. Six excerpts maximum. Text extraction cannot search image-only charts. Warsaw uses a report transcription with missing figures and appendices.
4 matching PDF pages. Showing 4 short source excerpts. Open the document for full context.
Printed page 142. PDF page 160.
outside the airplane that coupled to FQIS wiring; a transfer of electromagnetic force from personal electronic devices (PED) or other potential emitters within the airplane to the FQIS wiring; a transient voltage/current spike from wiring associated with other, higher-voltageOpen final report at PDF page 160NTSB AAR-00/03: In-flight breakup, TWA flight 800
Printed page 163. PDF page 181.
Information 163 Aircraft Accident Report 1.16.6.4.2.1 Electromagnetic Interference from Personal Electronic Devices On Board TWA Flight 800 The Safety Board was aware of cases in which signals from PEDs reportedly adversely affected airplane systems.333 Therefore, to deterOpen final report at PDF page 181NTSB AAR-00/03: In-flight breakup, TWA flight 800
Printed page 280. PDF page 298.
CWT. The Safety Board also considered the possibility that power was transferred from personal electronic devices (PED) to the FQIS wiring. Therefore, at the Board's request, NASA LaRC scientists also studied the electromagnetic force that could be generated by PEDs.Open final report at PDF page 298NTSB AAR-00/03: In-flight breakup, TWA flight 800
Printed page 307. PDF page 325.
the fuel/air vapor in the center wing fuel tank. 13. Electromagnetic interference from personal electronic devices played no role in igniting the fuel/air vapor in TWA flight 800's center wing fuel tank. 14. It is unlikely that electromagnetic interference fromOpen final report at PDF page 325NTSB AAR-00/03: In-flight breakup, TWA flight 800