Search report text, read a short matching passage, then open the source page.
Exact phrases match first; otherwise all words must occur close together. Six excerpts maximum. Text extraction cannot search image-only charts. Warsaw uses a report transcription with missing figures and appendices.
7 matching PDF pages. Showing 6 short source excerpts. Open the document for full context.
Printed page xi. PDF page 14.
go-around until the airplane was below 100 ft, at which point the airplane did not have the performance capability to accomplish a go-around. The flight crew's insufficient monitoring of airspeed indications during the approach resulted from expectancy, increased workload, fatOpen final report at PDF page 14NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 57. PDF page 75.
hypothetical go-around scenarios was evaluated with the knowledge that the calculated go-around performance capability would be conservative in the ground effect region. The simulation results indicated that the airplane had adequate performance capability to accomplish a go-arounOpen final report at PDF page 75NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 85. PDF page 103.
According to the performance study, after this point, the airplane likely no longer had performance capability to accomplish a go-around. The PF and PM recalled seeing the accompanying "airspeed low" message on the EICAS. Their attention was likely drawn toOpen final report at PDF page 103NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 105. PDF page 123.
altitude, and low thrust) and, based on the performance study, likely did not have the performance capability to accomplish a go-around. Nevertheless, this accident provides information that can be used as part of ongoing efforts to develop requirements for lowOpen final report at PDF page 123NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 126. PDF page 144.
go-around until the airplane was below 100 ft, at which point the airplane did not have the performance capability to accomplish a go-around. 6. The flight crew was experiencing fatigue, which likely degraded their performance during the approach. 7. NonstandardOpen final report at PDF page 144NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 188. PDF page 206.
- activated. 4. The simulation study indicated that the accident flight had adequate performance capability to accomplish a go around initiated no later than 11 to 12 seconds prior to ground impact. If a smaller tolerance is built in toOpen final report at PDF page 206NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214