Original words, traceable pages

Search the evidence

Search report text, read a short matching passage, then open the source page.

Exact phrases match first; otherwise all words must occur close together. Six excerpts maximum. Text extraction cannot search image-only charts. Warsaw uses a report transcription with missing figures and appendices.

12 matching PDF pages. Showing 6 short source excerpts. Open the document for full context.

Asiana Airlines 214

Printed page xi. PDF page 14.

to maintain the desired glidepath; these were two indications that the approach was not stabilized. Based on these two indications, the flight crew should have determined that the approach was unstabilized and initiated a go-around, but they did not do
Open final report at PDF page 14NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214

Asiana Airlines 214

Printed page 64. PDF page 82.

respond "stabilized" or "go-around;" and a go-around should be made if the approach was not stabilized. In a postaccident interview, the PF stated that at 500 ft AFE, the airplane should be stabilized, and for a visual approach, the airplane
Open final report at PDF page 82NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214

Asiana Airlines 214

Printed page 83. PDF page 101.

was not appropriate (it should have been about 56% N1 speed). Because the approach was not stabilized at 500 ft agl, the flight crew should have conducted a go-around. Either the pilots did not notice that these parameters exceeded stabilized
Open final report at PDF page 101NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214

Asiana Airlines 214

Printed page 57. PDF page 75.

airport elevation, Asiana flight 214 had a sink rate greater than 1,000 fpm and did not meet the appropriate power setting guidance for flaps 30� with the gear down.75 Below 500 ft above airport elevation, the approach was evaluated to
Open final report at PDF page 75NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214

Asiana Airlines 214

Printed page 65. PDF page 83.

go-around with the PF during the flight, he said that if performance requirements were not met, he (the PM) would say "I have control." The FOM, paragraph 7.10.2, "Decision to Land," subparagraph 7.10.2.1, "Responsibility," stated that the "captain has authority
Open final report at PDF page 83NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214

Asiana Airlines 214

Printed page 66. PDF page 84.

advise runway and taxiway to PF 6. When aircraft is unstabilized or safe landing is not assured, advise the PF to make a missed approach. Subparagraph 2.13.2.2, "Deviation Callout," stated that when airspeed, glideslope, localizer, sink rate, thrust, or visual
Open final report at PDF page 84NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214