Search report text, read a short matching passage, then open the source page.
Exact phrases match first; otherwise all words must occur close together. Six excerpts maximum. Text extraction cannot search image-only charts. Warsaw uses a report transcription with missing figures and appendices.
72 matching PDF pages. Showing 6 short source excerpts. Open the document for full context.
Printed page xii. PDF page 15.
mode control panel. This lack of adherence is likely the reason that the PF did not call out "flight level change" when he selected FLCH SPD. As a result, and because the PM's attention was likely on changing the flapOpen final report at PDF page 15NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 62. PDF page 80.
crew should use the FMA to verify mode changes for the A/P, F/D, and A/T and that to "call out loudly and clearly to the changes on the FMA and thrust mode display when they occur are a good CRMOpen final report at PDF page 80NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 64. PDF page 82.
POM, subparagraph 2.13.6.8, "Standard Callout & Response," stated that the PM should call out "five hundred" at 500 ft AFE; the PF should respond "stabilized" or "go-around;" and a go-around should be made if the approach was not stabilized. InOpen final report at PDF page 82NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 83. PDF page 101.
(Burin 2011). Asiana's POM guidance for visual approaches stated that the PM should call out "five hundred" at 500 ft above the touchdown height, and the PF should respond "stabilized," or "go around." The PM did not make a 500-ftOpen final report at PDF page 101NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 87. PDF page 105.
accompany these selections with a callout. The PM was supposed to respond "check" and call out every mode change displayed on the FMA. Throughout the approach, the pilots sometimes adhered to this procedure but did not consistently do so. ForOpen final report at PDF page 105NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214
Printed page 88. PDF page 106.
involving selections and callouts pertaining to the MCP is likely the reason the PF did not call out "flight level change" when he pushed the FLCH button at 1,550 ft. As a result, and for other reasons discussed earlier, theOpen final report at PDF page 106NTSB AAR-14/01: Asiana Airlines 214