Search report text, read a short matching passage, then open the source page.
Exact phrases match first; otherwise all words must occur close together. Six excerpts maximum. Text extraction cannot search image-only charts. Warsaw uses a report transcription with missing figures and appendices.
4 matching PDF pages. Showing 4 short source excerpts. Open the document for full context.
Printed page label not indexed. PDF page 52.
produced by an accumulation of snow or slush on the runway surface, would result in subnormal acceleration, the Safety Board did not believe that these factors alone would account for the performance deficiency evident in this accident. Furthermore, the recordedOpen official document at PDF page 52NTSB AAR-82/08: Air Florida Boeing 737-222 N62AF
Printed page 74. PDF page 79.
increased and the length of runway available for stopping will be decreased. Thus, with subnormal acceleration, such as occurred during the takeoff of Flight 90, there is no assurance that the aircraft can stop from V, on the remaining runwayOpen official document at PDF page 79NTSB AAR-82/08: Air Florida Boeing 737-222 N62AF
Printed page label not indexed. PDF page 51.
acceleration during the takeoff roll and its subsequent climb and acceleration were subnormal. A normal B-737 at the weight of the accident aircraft and under the existing environmental conditions should accelerate in about 30 seconds to a liftoff at aboutOpen official document at PDF page 51NTSB AAR-82/08: Air Florida Boeing 737-222 N62AF
Printed page label not indexed. PDF page 53.
and flight trajectory information for the accident aircraft to determine whether the subnormal performance could be attributed solely to the reduced takeoff thrust. The takeoff roll acceleration for the accident aircraft, as indicated by airspeed, time, and distance, coOpen official document at PDF page 53NTSB AAR-82/08: Air Florida Boeing 737-222 N62AF