Search report text, read a short matching passage, then open the source page.
Exact phrases match first; otherwise all words must occur close together. Six excerpts maximum. Text extraction cannot search image-only charts. Warsaw uses a report transcription with missing figures and appendices.
8 matching PDF pages. Showing 6 short source excerpts. Open the document for full context.
Printed page 14. PDF page 22.
absorbed through the load bar, which can result in the flange fracturing. Air Canada standard operating procedures (SOPs) do not require flight crews to perform a pull test. The company's approved maintenance schedule includes an inspection of the restraint systemOpen official document at PDF page 22Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015
Printed page 46. PDF page 54.
46 | Transportation Safety Board of Canada Table 4. Differences between Air Canada Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and the Air Canada Flight Crew Operating Manual (FCOM) Air Canada SOPs Air Canada FCOM* At 0.3 NAUTICAL MILES prior to FAF, orOpen official document at PDF page 54Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015
Printed page 51. PDF page 59.
corrected altitude. In April 2010, Airbus published a Temporary Revision to the FCOM Standard Operating Procedures, Non-Precision Approaches. 85 Although this revision, which introduced an FPA correction chart for cold weather operation, provided additional guidance, itOpen official document at PDF page 59Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015
Printed page 65. PDF page 73.
and Jeppesen have included a distance/altitude table on selected charts. Air Canada's standard operating procedure and historical practice when flying in flight path angle (FPA) guidance mode was that once the aircraft was past the final approach fix (FAF), theOpen official document at PDF page 73Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015
Printed page 74. PDF page 82.
Canada 3.0 Findings 3.1 Findings as to causes and contributing factors 1. Air Canada's standard operating procedure (SOP) and practice when flying in flight path angle guidance mode was that, once the aircraft was past the final approach fix, theOpen official document at PDF page 82Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015
Printed page 76. PDF page 84.
Transport Canada had reviewed and approved Air Canada's aircraft operating manual and the standard operating procedures (SOPs), it had not identified the discrepancy between the Air Canada SOPs and the Airbus flight crew operating manual regarding the requirement to monitorOpen official document at PDF page 84Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015