Search report text, read a short matching passage, then open the source page.
Exact phrases match first; otherwise all words must occur close together. Six excerpts maximum. Text extraction cannot search image-only charts. Warsaw uses a report transcription with missing figures and appendices.
3 matching PDF pages. Showing 3 short source excerpts. Open the document for full context.
Printed page 68. PDF page 76.
because of their reliance on the autopilot system. Flight crews can be subject to a plan continuation bias: without salient triggers, they will continue with their original plan (that is, to carry out the landing). In this occurrence, there wasOpen official document at PDF page 76Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015
Printed page 74. PDF page 82.
that the aircraft was too low during the approach would have been delayed because of plan continuation bias. 9. The aircraft struck terrain approximately 740 feet short of the runway threshold, bounced twice, and then slid along the runway beforeOpen official document at PDF page 82Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015
Printed page 54. PDF page 62.
that arrives piecemeal over time in incomplete, sometimes ambiguous, fragments. 94 Plan continuation, a form of confirmation bias, is a “deep-rooted tendency of individuals to continue their original plan of action even when changing circumstances require a new plan.”Open official document at PDF page 62Aviation Investigation Report A15H0002: Collision with terrain, Air Canada, Airbus Industrie A320-211, C-FTJP, 29 March 2015